- Regresar a la página principal »
- Sciencedaily »
- Diversity Aided Mammals’ Survival Over Deep Time
When it comes to adapting to climate change, diversity is the mammal's
best defense. That is one of the conclusions of the first study of how
mammals in North America adapted to climate change in "deep time" -- a
period of 56 million years beginning with the Eocene and ending 12,000
years ago with the terminal Pleistocene extinction when mammoths,
saber-toothed tigers, giant sloths and most of the other
Before we can predict how mammals will respond to climate change in
the future, we need to understand how they responded to climate change
in the past," said Larisa R. G. DeSantis, the assistant professor of
earth and environmental studies at Vanderbilt who directed the study.
"It is particularly important to establish a baseline that shows how
they adapted before humans came on the scene to complicate the picture."
Establishing such a baseline is particularly important for mammals
because their ability to adapt to environmental changes makes it
difficult to predict how they will respond. For example, mammals have
demonstrated the ability to dramatically alter their size and completely
change their diet when their environment is altered. In addition,
mammals have the mobility to move as the environment shifts. And their
ability to internally regulate their temperature gives them more
flexibility than cold-blooded organisms like reptiles.
The study, which was published on Apr. 23 in the journal Public Library of Science One,
tracked the waxing and waning of the range and diversity of families of
mammals that inhabited the continental United States during this
extended period. In taxonomy, species are groups of individuals with
common characteristics that (usually) can mate; genera are groups of
species that are related or structurally similar and families are
collections of genera with common attributes.
Scientists consider the fossil record of mammals in the U.S. for the
study period to be reasonably complete. However, it is frequently
impossible to distinguish between closely related species based on their
fossil remains and it can even be difficult to tell members of
different genera apart. Therefore the researchers performed the analysis
at the family level. They analyzed 35 different families, such as
Bovidae (bison, sheep, antelopes); Cricetidae (rats, mice, hamsters,
voles); Equidae (horses, donkeys); Ursidae (bears); Mammutidae
(mammoths); and Leporidae (rabbits and hares).
The study found that the relative range and distribution of mammalian
families remained strikingly consistent throughout major climate
changes over the past 56 million years. This period began with an
extremely hot climate, with a global temperature about six degrees
hotter than today (too hot for ice to survive even at the poles) and
gradually cooled down to levels only slightly higher than today. It was
followed by a dramatic temperature drop and a similarly abrupt warming
and finished off with the Ice Ages that alternated between relatively
cold glacial and warm interglacial periods.
"These data clearly show that most families were extremely resilient
to climate and environmental change over deep time," DeSantis said.
Horses were consistently the most widely distributed family from the
Eocene to the Pliocene (and remained highly dominant, just not number
one, in the Pleistocene). In contrast, families with more restricted
ranges maintained lower range areas. Thus, their work demonstrates that
mammals maintained similar niches through deep time and is consistent
with the idea that family members may inherit their ranges from
ancestral species. The idea that niches are conserved over time is a
fundamental assumption of models that predict current responses of
mammals to climate change.
The analysis also found a link between a family's diversity and its
range: Family's with the greater diversity were more stable and had
larger ranges than less diverse families.
"Diversity is good. The more species a family has that fill different
niches, the greater its ability to maintain larger ranges regardless of
climate change," said DeSantis.
While most families during certain periods of time yielded either
gains in species/genera (e.g., Oligocene to Miocene) or losses (Miocene
to Pliocene), these changes were remarkably consistent through time with
overall gains or losses in one genera typically yielding a gain or loss
in of about two species.
Although the extent of family ranges remained relatively constant,
the study found that these ranges moved south and east from the Eocene
to the Pleistocene. That is most likely a response to the general
climate cooling that took place during the period. However, southeastern
movement of ranges from the Pliocene to the Pleistocene may also be
complicated by the influx of South American animals when the Isthmus of
Panama was formed. This triggered a tremendous exchange of species that
has been labeled "The Great American Interchange." As a result, some of
the southern movement of families' ranges may have been due to the
influx of South American mammals, like the sloth and armadillo, moving
north, the researchers cautioned.
The study also looked for evidence that families containing megafauna
or other species that went extinct during the terminal Pleistocene
extinction (also known as the Quaternary or Ice Age extinction) might
have been in decline beforehand, but failed to find any evidence for any
such "extinction prone" families. If climate change was the culprit,
DeSantis and her team expect to see differences between families
containing megafauna and those composed of smaller animals. However, the
fact that they didn't find such evidence cannot completely rule out
this possibility.
The role that diversity plays in mammalian adaptation is particularly
important because mammal species have been going extinct in record
numbers for the past 400 years. In a 2008 report, the International
Union for the Conservation of Nature predicted that one in four species
of land mammals in the world faces extinction. As a result, the
diversity of mammalian families is declining at a time when they need it
the most to cope with a rapidly changing climate.