- Regresar a la página principal »
- Courtesy of Sciencedaily , Cro Magnon , Heilderbergensis , Homo , Neanderthal »
- Homo Heidelbergensis Was Only Slightly Taller Than the Neanderthal
Posted by : Unknown
9 jun 2012
Along with its enormous quantity of fossils, one of the most
important features of the Sima de los Huesos (SH) site in Atapuerca,
Burgos, is the splendid state of the findings. They are so well
conserved that the 27 complete bones from some 500,000 years ago have
been reconstructed.
"The incredible collection allows us to estimate the height of species such as Homo heidelbergensis,
who inhabited Europe during the Middle Pleistocene era and is the
ancestor of the Neanderthal. Such estimations are based solely on
analysis of the large complete bones, like those from the arm and the
leg," as explained by José Miguel Carretero Díaz, researcher at the
Laboratory of Human Evolution of the University of Burgos and lead
author of the study that has been published in the 'Journal of Human
Evolution' journal.
In addition, since bones were complete, the researchers were able to
determine whether they belonged to a male or female and thus calculate
the height of both men and women. "Estimations to date were based on
incomplete bone samples, the length of which had to be estimated too. We
also used to use formulas based on just one reference population and we
were not even sure as to its appropriateness," outlines the researcher.
Since the most fitting race or ecology for these human beings was
unknown, scientists used multiracial and multigender formulas to
estimate the height for the entire population in order to reduce the
error margin and get a closer insight on the reality. As Carretero Díaz
points out, "we calculated an overall average for the sample and one for
each of the sexes. The same was done with the Neanderthal and
Cro-Magnon fossils."
The results suggest that both men and women in the Sima de los Huesos
population were on average slightly higher than Neanderthal men and
women. "Neither can be described as being short and both are placed in
the medium and above-medium height categories. But, both species
featured tall individuals," assured the experts.
The height of these two species is similar to that of modern day
population of mid-latitudes, like in the case of Central Europe and the
Mediterranean.
The humans who arrived in Europe during the Upper Palaeolithic era,
Cro-Magnons or anatomically modern humans, replaced the Neanderthal
populations. They were significantly taller than other human species and
their average height for both sexes was higher, falling in the very
tall individual category.
Height remained the same for some 2 million years.
According to the researchers, putting aside the margin corresponding to small biotype species like Homo habilis (East Africa), Homo georgicus (Georgia) and Homo floresiensis (Flores in Indonesia), all documented humans during the Early and Middle Pleistocene Era that inhabited Africa (Homo ergaster, Homo rhodesiensis), Asia (Homo erectus) and Europe (Homo antecessor, Homo heidelbergensis and Homo neanderthalensis)
seemed to have medium and above-medium heights for the most part of two
millions years. However, the researchers state that "amongst every
population we have found a tall or very tall individual."
In their opinion, this suggests that the height of the Homo genus
remained more or less stable for 2 million years until the appearance of
a "ground-breaking species in this sense" in Africa just 200,000 years
ago. These were the Homo sapiens, who were initially significantly
taller than any other species that existed at the time.
"The explanation is found in the overall morphological change in the
body biotype that prevailed in our species compared to our ancestors.
The Homo sapiens had a slimmer body, lighter bones, longer legs and were
taller," adds the researcher.
A lighter body aided survival
Scientists have documented various advantages that made the sapiens
biotype more adaptable. These include their thermoregulatory, obstetric
and nutritional make-up but in the eyes of the experts, the greatest
advantage of this new body type was increased endurance and energy.
Carretero Díaz indicates that "larger legs, narrower hips, being
taller and having lighter bones not only meant a reduction in body
weight (less muscular fat) but a bigger stride, greater speed and a
lower energy cost when moving the body, walking or running."
This type of anatomy could have been highly advantageous in terms of
survival in Eurasia during the Upper Pleistocene Era when two
intelligent human species (the light-bodied Cro-Magnons and
Neanderthals) had to face difficult climatic conditions, drastic changes
in ecosystems and ecological competition.